![]() The article concludes that autonomous weapons are unable to make proportionality assessments on an operational or strategic level on their own, and that humans should not be expected to be completely absent from the battlefield in the near future. Kenneth Anderson et al., Adapting the Law of Armed Conflict to Autonomous Weapon. It analyses aspects of the proportionality rule that would militate against the use of autonomous weapons systems and aspects that would appear to benefit the protection of the civilian population if such weapons systems were used. This article assesses the question whether the rule on proportionality in attacks would preclude the legal use of autonomous weapons. By autonomous weapon systems, we mean systems that, once activated, can select and engage targets without further intervention by a human operator. See, e.g., Anderson et al. Abstract: It is important that normative development regarding autonomous weapon systems head down a path that is coherent and practical. The principle of proportionality is sometimes cited as an important obstacle to the use of autonomous weapons systems in accordance with the law. weapons) Kenneth Anderson et al., Adapting the Law of Armed Conflict to Autonomous Weapon Systems, 90 INT’L L. Autonomous weapons systems raise the question of whether they could comply with international humanitarian law. ![]() Once they are deployed, these weapons will use artificial intelligence to select and attack targets without further human intervention. Given the swift technologic development, it may be expected that the availability of the first truly autonomous weapons systems is fast approaching. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |